Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40853606›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2025

Digital transformation of robotic surgery train the trainer 'TTT' courses: training the trainer in technique and technology (the 4Ts course).

Justin W Collins, Nader Francis, Fares Haddad, Mark Coleman, Steven Stamenkovic, Asit Arora, Bas Wijnhoven, Altaf Awan, Tom Cecil, Nahid Gul and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Justin W CollinsDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK. justin.collins@ucl.ac.uk.
Nader FrancisThe Griffin Institute, Northwick Park, Harrow, UK.
Fares HaddadDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Mark ColemanDepartment of Surgery, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Steven StamenkovicThoracic surgery, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Asit AroraENT surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Bas WijnhovenOncological and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Altaf AwanDivision of General Surgery, Derby Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, United Kingdom.
Tom CecilThe Griffin Institute, Northwick Park, Harrow, UK.
Nahid GulObstetrics and gynaecology, Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wirral, United Kingdom.
Jawad AhmadHepatobilary surgeon, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Subash VasudevanThe Griffin Institute, Northwick Park, Harrow, UK.
Ben ChallacombeDepartment of urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Nuha A YassinUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the role of robot-assisted surgery continues to expand there has been as an associated proliferation of novel technologies to aid training. Necessitating the development of standardised and validated training programmes that incorporate guidance on curriculum development with training techniques, and where and when to utilise novel training technologies. To provide guidance on an optimised "Train-the-Trainer in Technique and Technology" (4Ts) structured educational programme for surgical trainers, in which delegates learn a standardised approach to training candidates in knowledge and skills acquisition both for surgery and the utilisation of novel training technologies. We aim to describe a 4Ts course for robotic surgery based on the current published literature and to define the key elements within a 4Ts course by seeking consensus from an expert committee formed of key opinion leaders in training and MedTech industry. The project was carried out in phases: a systematic review of the current evidence was conducted, a hybrid meeting was held, and an initial survey was created based on the current literature and expert opinion and sent to the committee. Twenty experts in robotic training, contributed to the Delphi process that included clinicians, academics, and industry representing nine different surgical specialties and seven different robotic companies. An accelerated Delphi process underwent three rounds of survey in total. Additions to the second- and third-round surveys were formulated based on the answers and comments from the previous rounds. Consensus opinion was defined as 80% agreement. There was 100% consensus that there was a need for a standardized platform agnostic 4Ts course in robotic surgery. A consensus was reached in multiple areas, including the following: (1) definitions and terminologies, (2) qualifications to attend, (3) course objectives, (4) pre-course considerations, (5) requirements of e-learning, (6) theory and course content, and (7) measurement of outcomes and (8) performance certification and regulation. The resulting formulated curriculum showed good internal consistency among experts, with a Cronbach alpha of 0.90. An evidence-based consensus has been achieved to reach content validation for guidance on a 4Ts curriculum for robotic surgery training. This recommended content lays the foundation for developing platform agnostic metric-based progression curricula for trainers in robotic surgery. Future 4Ts curricula related to procedural training will require further validation. As the role of robot-assisted surgery continues to expand, development of standardised and validated training programmes is becoming increasingly important. There is currently a lack of agreement on how best to train trainers in both training and awareness of novel training technologies. We report a consensus view on a standardised "4Ts" curriculum focused on robotic surgery. It was formulated by polling the opinions of experts and industry, combining current evidence for training technologies with experts' knowledge of surgical training.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresClinical CompetenceCurriculumDelphi TechniqueHumansCurriculum developmentDigital TransformationHydrogel modelsRobot-assisted surgerySurgical Data ScienceSurgical educationTrainingTrain the trainerVirtual Reality

Identifiers

PMID40853606
PMCPMC12378647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.