Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40853587›Full record

ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2026

Frequency of posterior interosseous nerve syndrome and its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with lateral epicondylitis: A prospective, controlled, electrophysiological study.

Çiğdem Çilingiroğlu, Meral Bilgilisoy Filiz, Şebnem Koldaş Doğan, Tuncay Çakır, Naciye Füsun Toraman, Gülşah Çelik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Çiğdem ÇilingiroğluDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Antalya City Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6269-486X
Meral Bilgilisoy FilizDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3064-2878
Şebnem Koldaş DoğanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0484-1336
Tuncay ÇakırDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5233-5318
Naciye Füsun ToramanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8141-4525
Gülşah ÇelikDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Antalya City Hospital, Antalya, Turkey. gulsahberberr@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1170-4110

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLateral epicondylitis (LE) is a musculoskeletal disorder characterized by pain around the lateral epicondyle. Posterior interosseous nerve syndrome (PINS), a rare neuropathy caused by radial nerve compression, can mimic or coexist with LE, complicating diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate the electrophysiological presence of PINS in LE and determine its impact on symptoms.

methodsThis prospective study included 62 patients diagnosed with LE and 54 healthy controls. Electrophysiological examinations were performed on all patients in the LE group to investigate the presence of PINS. Subsequently, PINS-positive and PINS-negative patients within the LE group underwent a detailed clinical evaluation, including provocative tests, joint range of motion (ROM), hand grip strength, and symptom scoring using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE).

resultsPINS was identified in 19.4% of LE patients and 1.9% of controls (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between PINS-positive and PINS-negative patients in the LE group regarding provocative tests, joint ROM, grip strength, VAS, or PRTEE scores. The diagnosis of PINS was made solely based on electrophysiological findings. DISCUSSION: This study highlights the importance of electrophysiological evaluation in the differential diagnosis of PINS and LE, especially in treatment-resistant cases. Although PINS did not significantly impact clinical parameters such as grip strength or symptom scores, its notable prevalence in LE patients underscores the need for its consideration in refractory LE cases. Further large-scale, controlled studies are needed to explore this relationship comprehensively.

Indexed as

Nerve Compression SyndromesRadial NeuropathyTennis ElbowAdultAgedFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularDifferential diagnosisElectromyographyLateral epicondylitisPosterior interosseous nerve syndrome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.