SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2025
Learning curve of robotic colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical proficiency, outcomes, and training protocols.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Learning curves in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Time-series and thematic analyses of clinical utilities and operational issues in early clinical studies of the da Vinci surgical system.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Robotic curriculum and development strategies in robotic abdominal surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Limitations of procedural learning curves: reassessment of the clinical relevance of learning curve analysis in robotic right hemicolectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Economic transition during robotic colorectal surgery implementation: reduced device costs and improved gross profit per hospital day.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic cholecystectomy during surgical training: learning curve and perioperative outcomes of 441 consecutive cases in a high-volume teaching center.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Surgeon- and procedure-specific variability in operative-time learning curves during parallel implementation of robotic colorectal surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Robotic Segmental Resection of the Splenic Flexure and Mid-Transverse Colon for Malignancy Treatment: A Systematic Review of Operative Techniques, Anastomotic Approaches, and Surgical and Oncological Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This investigation systematically evaluates the skill acquisition process in robotic colectomy procedures, determining the case volume required for surgical competency and assessing the effectiveness of various training methodologies. A comprehensive evidence synthesis was performed according to PRISMA standards. Multiple medical databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library) were systematically interrogated for relevant publications from January 2000 to January 2024. Eligible studies documented proficiency development in robotic colectomy, providing metrics on procedure duration, adverse events, and educational approaches. Analytical methods incorporated random-effects modeling with heterogeneity evaluation through I
methodsFrom an initial pool of 1,800 potential studies, 35 met rigorous inclusion criteria, collectively representing 7500 surgical cases.
resultsProficiency development required between 20 and 70 procedures, with a weighted mean of 45 cases (95% confidence interval: 40-50). Significant reductions in operative duration (p < 0.001) and complication frequency (25% to 10%, p = 0.005) were observed following competency attainment. Training methodologies demonstrated considerable variation, with case volume requirements (designated TR-100 to TR-500) showing differential effectiveness. Formalized instructional programs incorporating simulation training and expert supervision correlated with accelerated skill acquisition.
conclusionachieving technical proficiency in robotic colectomy typically necessitates approximately 45 cases, with measurable enhancements in both procedural efficiency and clinical outcomes. The implementation of systematic training frameworks, particularly those integrating simulation components and mentored practice, appears crucial for optimizing surgical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40853513What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.