ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Technique and outcomes of robotic median arcuate ligament release in 52 patients: a multidisciplinary experience.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robotic median arcuate ligament release in a pediatric surgery center.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic Approach to Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome: A Single-Center Experience.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite previous reports of robotic-assisted release for median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS), the safety and efficacy of this approach have been difficult to establish due to the rarity of the disease. We aimed to present our experience at a tertiary surgery referral center. We performed a retrospective analysis of all robotic-assisted median arcuate ligament release (rMALR) performed at our institution from 7/2019 to 5/2025. The diagnosis was based on symptoms at presentation, celiac artery duplex ultrasound, and findings on computed tomographic angiography. The primary outcomes include resolution of symptoms at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years follow-up. Secondary outcomes include resolution of narcotic use, operative time, 30-day mortality, length of stay, and postoperative complications. 52 patients underwent robotic MALR; 94% were females, with a mean age of 39 (18.2-52) years and a mean BMI of 21.2 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
40853510What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.