ArticleNeuroRehabilitation2025
Bilateral Prefrontal Cortex Activation During Sensorimotor Tasks in People with Subacute Stroke - An Exploratory Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study.
Article in NeuroRehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research progress on the mechanisms and clinical applications of neuromodulation techniques for intervening in interhemispheric imbalance after stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Differential effects of static and dynamic visual prompts on attention-motor performance: the role of sustained attention after stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundPost-stroke, damage to the prefrontal cortex (PFC) disrupts the neural circuits involved in motor control and sensorimotor integration, which contributes to impaired ankle sensorimotor function.ObjectiveApply functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) post-stroke to investigate, 1) whether PFC activation differed among active and passive dorsiflexion/plantarflexion and somatosensory stimulation of the paretic ankle, 2) differences between hemispheres, and 3) interhemispheric asymmetry and functional outcomes.MethodsIn nine participants, bilateral hemodynamic responses of the PFC were collected with fNIRS during active and passive dorsiflexion/plantarflexion and somatosensory stimulation. Sensorimotor function and interhemispheric asymmetry were assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity (FMLE) assessment and laterality index.ResultsAcross the three tasks, no differences in PFC activation were found within or between hemispheres. There was a potential relationship between interhemispheric asymmetry with the sensory and motor portions of the FMLE, suggesting that greater asymmetry during passive and somatosensory stimulation tasks may be associated with poorer functional outcomes.ConclusionsOur results highlight that ankle sensorimotor functions may not generate different levels of PFC activation in a single hemisphere. The imbalance of PFC activation between the hemispheres from somatosensory and motor input may relate to clinical somatosensory function, which could be a useful measure of recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.