ArticleBrain structure & function2025
Evaluating the effective segmentation of human lateral geniculate nucleus.
Article in Brain structure & function, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Important parts of the visual pathway occur in relatively small subcortical structures that are often difficult to identify and segment using standard structural scans in MRI (e.g. T1 and T2 scans). Studies of the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus (LGN) often use proton density (PD) scan protocols, repeated up to 40 times, then manually segment the LGN structure from the average image. Efficiency is crucial when conducting MRI scans: minimising time spent on structural scanning can increase time available for complementary functional MRI scans and/or reduce scanning costs. In this study we asked how segmentation accuracy depended on the number of PD repeats. Four raters segmented the LGN of five participants, using different numbers of PD scans in the average image (1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40), and an additional experienced expert rater segmented the LGN for just the 40PD average for all participants. We compared how the rater LGN masks at each scan average level overlapped with the expert masks. One rater performed the segmentation for the 40PD average on four separate days, to measure intra-rater variability across repeats. We also used a state-of-the-art automated segmentation process to compare the reliability to manual segmentation. We found that the average overlap between rater masks and the expert masks increased up to the 16PD scan average level, after which there was no additional benefit to including more PD scans. The automated segmentation masks were comparable to the overlap between the raters (40PD) and expert masks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.