ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Optimal trigger threshold with the bolus-tracking technique for the renal CT angiography protocol.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to investigate the optimal trigger threshold for the renal CT angiography (CTA) protocol with the bolus-tracking technique.
methodsThis retrospective study included patients suspected of having renal diseases and candidate kidney transplant donors who underwent renal CTA from July 2019 to August 2021. Renal arterial (RA) phase scanning was initiated using either one of the following two trigger thresholds: 50 HU (50-HU group; n = 42) and 100 HU (100-HU group; n = 63). A radiologist measured CT attenuations of the vasculature and renal parenchyma on RA phase images. Two radiologists classified RA phase images into appropriate RA-, late RA-, or corticomedullary (CM)-timing. Unpaired t- and Fisher's exact tests were conducted to assess differences in the CT attenuations and the proportion of categorical classifications between the two groups.
resultsOverall, 105 patients (mean age: 59.8 years; 60 men) were included. CT attenuations of the aorta and renal arteries were comparable between the two groups (P = 0.38-0.95). CT attenuations of the renal cortex and renal vein were higher in the 100-HU group than in the 50-HU group (P = 0.006-0.04). The proportion of the appropriate RA-timing was higher, whereas that of the CM-timing was lower in the 50-HU group than in the 100-HU group (appropriate RA-, late RA-, and CM-timing: 78.6% vs. 50.8%, 19.0% vs. 34.9%, and 2.4% vs. 14.3%; P = 0.01 for reviewer 1 and 64.3% vs. 27.0%, 33.3% vs. 63.5%, and 2.4% vs. 9.5%; P < 0.001 for reviewer 2, respectively).
conclusionThe trigger threshold of 50 HU provided a higher probability of obtaining appropriate RA-timing images than that of 100 HU in the renal CTA protocol with the bolus-tracking technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40853470What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.