Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40853450›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2025

[Self-esteem differences based on sexual orientation in Germany : Changes over time].

Robert Heidemann

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Robert HeidemannFakultät Sozialwissenschaften, TU Dortmund, Martin-Schmeißer-Weg 8, 44227, Dortmund, Deutschland. robert.heidemann@tu-dortmund.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4496-4031

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent decades social acceptance and legal equality of lesbian, gay and bisexual people (LGB) in Germany have improved. In particular, the debate on the possibility of marriage for same sex couples revealed broad social acceptance; however, health inequalities, such as in self-esteem, continue to exist in relation to heterosexual people. The LGB persons in the second half of life are particularly affected by these disadvantages because they grew up in times of greater discrimination.

objectiveThis raises the central question: to what extent do improved overall social conditions affect the self-esteem of LGB people? MATERIAL AND

methodsTo answer this question 5 waves (2008, 2011, 2014, 2017, 2021) of the German Ageing Study (DEAS) are used to examine how the self-esteem of LGB people has changed over time and in comparison to heterosexual people. In addition to bivariate descriptions, random effects models are applied for the analysis.

resultsThe self-esteem among LGB and heterosexual people increased until 2017 and then dropped slightly in 2021; however, the increase among LGB people is more pronounced, so that the difference compared to heterosexual people is no longer significant in 2017.

conclusionThe analysis suggests that greater social openness and improved legal conditions for LGB people in the second half of life are positively related to their self-esteem, thus emphasizing the importance of public discourse for the well-being of stigmatized groups.

Indexed as

HeterosexualitySelf ConceptSexual and Gender MinoritiesSexual BehaviorAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedDEASHealth inequalityLGB personsMental healthStructural stigma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.