Review3D printing in medicine2025
A scoping review of literature about 3D printing: knowledge, skills and attitude for simulation educators in healthcare.
Review in 3D printing in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of Surface Topography, Dimensional and Geometric Deviations, and Biocidal Properties of 3D Prints Made of Thermoplastic-Based Composites.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Systematic Review of Three-Dimensional Printing in Medical Education: Educational Impact and Methodological Quality.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThree-Dimensional (3D) printing, also known as additive manufacturing (Linke, Additive manufacturing, explained, 2017), has rapidly emerged as a transformative tool in healthcare simulation. This scoping review investigates simulation educators' knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSAs) about the impact of 3D printing and explores 3D printing's broader applications in healthcare simulation. By synthesizing existing literature, this study aims to identify trends, challenges, and opportunities for integrating 3D printing into simulation-based education. MAIN BODY: The review followed the PRISMA-ScR framework, employing a six-step approach. A comprehensive search was conducted across databases, including PubMed, Medline, ERIC, CINAHL, and Google Scholar, covering studies published between 2000 and 2023. Keywords related to 3D printing and simulation-based education were used. Inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed articles discussing 3D printing's role in KSAs for simulation educators and its applications in healthcare simulation. Articles were charted and analyzed thematically to identify trends, challenges, and outcomes. A total of 181 studies were included, spanning 36 countries and 113 journals. Most studies focused on medical education, with 73% utilizing 3D-printed models for direct teaching. Key themes identified included realism, skill development, cost-effectiveness, and teaching effectiveness. Challenges included model accuracy, training gaps for educators, and resource limitations. Study designs were predominantly descriptive, with a significant portion being single-site case reports.
conclusion3D printing has the potential to revolutionize simulation-based education by enhancing realism, accessibility, and skill development. However, gaps in educator training and methodological rigor must be addressed. Future research should focus on multi-institutional studies and long-term outcomes to maximize the impact of the technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.