ArticleChild psychiatry and human development2025
Impulsive Decision Reduction Training for Youth (IDRT-Y) to Promote Adaptive Decision-Making: Results from a Pilot Trial.
Article in Child psychiatry and human development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impulsive Decision Reduction Training (IDRT) reduces binge drinking and increases future orientation in young adult binge drinkers.Addictive behaviors · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decision biases contribute to disruptive behavior, substance use, and other risky behaviors in youth, yet few interventions directly target decision-making processes to promote adaptive outcomes. This study adapted Impulsive Decision Reduction Training for Youth (IDRT-Y) from an adult model to improve adolescent decision-making and reduce risky behaviors. In an open pilot trial, 26 youth (ages 10-17) with frequent, impairing risky behaviors were randomly assigned to either immediate intervention (n = 13) or a 12-week waitlist (n = 13). IDRT-Y involved eight weekly individual sessions with brief caregiver check-ins. Eighty-five percent of youth completed all sessions, with both youth and caregivers rating the program as highly acceptable. Pre- and post-intervention assessments measured decision-making tendencies, impulsivity, and behavioral outcomes. Significant within-person improvements were observed in youth-reported future orientation (p < 0.05), caregiver-reported executive functioning (p < 0.01), youth engagement in risky behaviors (p < 0.05), and caregiver-reported externalizing symptoms (p < 0.001). These findings support IDRT-Y as a feasible, acceptable intervention that engages both decision-making processes and behavioral outcomes. Further research is warranted to assess its efficacy in larger samples and diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40853411What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.