ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2025
The revolutionary impact of artificial intelligence in orthopedics: comprehensive review of current benefits and challenges.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedics: Clinical Performance, Limitations, and Translational Readiness-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- When Intuition Meets the Algorithm: Medico-Legal Implications of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Decision-Making in Orthopedics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Expanding the applications of artificial intelligence in emergency radiology: Advancing precision medicine and resource efficiency.World journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Global research hotspots and emerging trends in orthopedic robotic surgery: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Multimodal data integration in orthopedic regenerative medicine: bridging imaging, omics, and clinical data.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Review
- Research hotspots and trends of robotic rectal cancer surgery: a bibliometric analysis (2006-2025).Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Kinematic alignment in total knee replacement successfully restores the native knee phenotype in the short term.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence and multimodal imaging in orthopaedics: from technological advances to clinical translation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is changing orthopedics through improving accuracy before, during, and after surgery. This investigation is a comprehensive review on the use of AI in orthopedics, its advantages, and challenges. Preoperatively, AI imaging shows outstanding fracture detection (up to 98% accuracy), sports injury detection (e.g., ACL tear diagnosis with AUC 0.89-0.98), and tumor recognition, cutting diagnostic delays and human error. 3D AI planning in joint replacements augments surgical precision by 45%, while robotic navigation improves alignment and decreases revision rates. Intraoperatively, AI-driven robotic platforms (e.g., MAKO and ROSA) enable better bone resection and component positioning. The robots can be allowed to provide tactile feedback to the surgeon. Virtual and augmented reality advances surgical training by enhancing skill acquisition (Campa et al. in J Orthop Surg Res. 18:729, 2023). Postoperatively, AI allows personalized rehabilitation with sensors and predictive analytics, while remote monitoring tools can boost patient engagement. Progress has not wiped out all challenges. There are technical barriers to be concerned about including data dependence, algorithmic bias, and heterogeneous datasets. Ethical issues, such as the protection of private data, liability for AI errors, and informed consent, require appropriate governance structures. Clinical application is limited by cost, complexity, and resistance to standardized protocols that may not coincide with the preferences of surgeons. Solutions suggest AI hybrid models that include patient-specific anatomical data and impartial audits, as well as financing mechanisms. In conclusion, AI has enormous prospects to enhance orthopedic care by making it more precise, informed, and effective. However, it is necessary to address several technical, ethical, and adoption barriers to fully implement AI. Future directions include the focus on transparent, interpretable AI, multimodal data integration, and frameworks for innovation that balance clinician wisdom and patient-centric values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40853406What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.