Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40853406›Full record

ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2025

The revolutionary impact of artificial intelligence in orthopedics: comprehensive review of current benefits and challenges.

Salar Baghbani, Yoosef Mehrabi, Mohammad Movahedinia, Erfan Babaeinejad, Mohammadamin Joshaghanian, Shayan Amiri, Mostafa Shahrezaee

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Salar BaghbaniTrauma and Surgery Research Center, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Yoosef MehrabiTrauma and Surgery Research Center, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad MovahediniaOrthopedic Department, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Erfan BabaeinejadDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammadamin JoshaghanianOrthopedic Department, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shayan AmiriOrthopaedic Surgery, Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mostafa ShahrezaeeTrauma and Surgery Research Center, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. moshahrezayee@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is changing orthopedics through improving accuracy before, during, and after surgery. This investigation is a comprehensive review on the use of AI in orthopedics, its advantages, and challenges. Preoperatively, AI imaging shows outstanding fracture detection (up to 98% accuracy), sports injury detection (e.g., ACL tear diagnosis with AUC 0.89-0.98), and tumor recognition, cutting diagnostic delays and human error. 3D AI planning in joint replacements augments surgical precision by 45%, while robotic navigation improves alignment and decreases revision rates. Intraoperatively, AI-driven robotic platforms (e.g., MAKO and ROSA) enable better bone resection and component positioning. The robots can be allowed to provide tactile feedback to the surgeon. Virtual and augmented reality advances surgical training by enhancing skill acquisition (Campa et al. in J Orthop Surg Res. 18:729, 2023). Postoperatively, AI allows personalized rehabilitation with sensors and predictive analytics, while remote monitoring tools can boost patient engagement. Progress has not wiped out all challenges. There are technical barriers to be concerned about including data dependence, algorithmic bias, and heterogeneous datasets. Ethical issues, such as the protection of private data, liability for AI errors, and informed consent, require appropriate governance structures. Clinical application is limited by cost, complexity, and resistance to standardized protocols that may not coincide with the preferences of surgeons. Solutions suggest AI hybrid models that include patient-specific anatomical data and impartial audits, as well as financing mechanisms. In conclusion, AI has enormous prospects to enhance orthopedic care by making it more precise, informed, and effective. However, it is necessary to address several technical, ethical, and adoption barriers to fully implement AI. Future directions include the focus on transparent, interpretable AI, multimodal data integration, and frameworks for innovation that balance clinician wisdom and patient-centric values.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceOrthopedic ProceduresOrthopedicsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansAlgorithmic biasArtificial intelligenceMachine learningOrthopedic surgeryPostoperative rehabilitationRobotic-assisted surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.