ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Identification of potential drug targets and possible drugs for esophageal carcinoma from genetic insights: a comprehensive two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEsophageal carcinoma (EC) is the eighth most common cancer, which is a major health problem on a global scale. Comprehensive treatments such as surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy have demonstrated efficacy in certain patients with early-stage esophageal carcinoma. However, it is crucial to explore improved treatment modalities for individuals with advanced, recurrent and metastatic esophageal carcinoma.
methodsThe eQTL datasets were obtained from Drug-Gene Interaction Database (DGIdb V.4.2.0) and an interesting review about druggable genes. The two-sample MR was used to identify potential drug targets. Co-localization analysis was applied to evaluate if the genes expression single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) drove and was associated with EC risk. And drug prediction and molecular docking were used to verify the pharmaceutical value of potential clinical drugs.
resultsThe present study found thirty potential drug targets that were remarkably correlated with the risk of developing esophageal carcinoma at least in two eQTL datasets by two-sample MR analysis. Five genes colocalized with esophageal carcinoma were identified through colocalization analysis and the medicinal value of four potential clinical drugs was testified by molecular docking.
conclusionsWe identified five drug targets by MR analysis and co-localization analysis and four drugs by drug prediction and molecular docking analysis respectively, which provide new insights for treatment of esophageal carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.