ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
The prognostic value of PTEN expression in localized prostate cancer.
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient and Physician Perspectives on Prostate Cancer Data Presented at ASCO 2025.Oncology and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCurrent risk stratification systems for prostate cancer (PCa) lack precision, particularly for intermediate-risk patients. PTEN loss has emerged as a promising biomarker for predicting aggressive disease. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of PTEN status in patients diagnosed via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy and treated with radical prostatectomy (RP).
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 213 patients diagnosed via MRI-targeted biopsy with available PTEN testing between 2020 and 2023 at a referral center. Patients who underwent RP with undetectable postoperative PSA levels and a minimum follow-up of three months were included. The primary outcome was the prognostic value of PTEN status. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RP was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test, while Cox regression models identified predictors of BCR.
resultsOverall, 36/213 (17%) patients exhibited PTEN loss. These patients had more aggressive disease, characterized by higher clinical stage and ISUP grade group (p ≤ 0.01). Among the 56 patients treated with RP and followed for a median of 25 months, BCR-free survival was significantly lower in those with PTEN loss, especially in the intermediate-risk subgroup (log-rank test, p = 0.03). PTEN loss was identified as an independent predictor of BCR (Hazard Ratio: 8.5, p = 0.03).
conclusionPTEN loss in patients diagnosed via MRI-targeted biopsy and treated with RP is associated with worse prognosis. PTEN testing shows promise as a biomarker to improve patient counseling and guide PCa treatment decisions. Prospective studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to validate these findings fully.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40853393What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.