ReviewDie Anaesthesiologie2025
[Intensive care strategies for organ protection in patients with severe brain damage and imminent or confirmed irreversible brain death].
Review in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe 2025 revision of the donor identification guidelines by the German Medical Association reaffirms the importance of organ-protective intensive care or the application of intensive medical measures to maintain organ function in cases of imminent or established irreversible loss of brain function (brain death). These measures aim to preserve the possibility of organ donation in patients who have declared a willingness to donate or in whom the donation status remains uncertain. Currently, no evidence-based guidelines exist in Germany regarding the intensive care management in this context. This review aims to provide practical guidance on organ-protective intensive care and organ function-preserving strategies in adult patients with severe brain injury and imminent or confirmed brain death. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis review is based on relevant English and German language publications retrieved from databases (PubMed/Medline) as well as international guidelines and expert recommendations for action.
resultsAcross the continuum from imminent to confirmed brain death and the subsequent phase, various pathophysiological changes occur that have implications for organ-protective intensive care and the maintenance of organ function. These include disturbances in hemodynamics, lung function, the endocrine system and infectious complications. Additionally, some measures focus on organ protection after retrieval. Based on cohort and registry studies and few randomized trials, interventions such as intravenous administration of vasopressin and glucocorticoids as well as consistent lung-protective ventilation including recruitment maneuvers, appear to improve hemodynamics and lung function in certain situations; however, the overall evidence remains limited and key aspects, such as the optimal timing for vasopressin or glucocorticoid administration, remain unresolved. Other interventions, such as thyroid hormone substitution, low-threshold insulin administration, and the use of dopamine, continue to be controversially discussed. DISCUSSION: From the current literature recommendations can be derived regarding the use of organ-protective intensive care or organ function-preserving strategies in the context of brain death, mainly under specific conditions such as hemodynamic instability. In the clinical practice, general standards of intensive care should therefore be applied. Further research initiatives are urgently needed to address both specific medical interventions and healthcare supply aspects. This could be achieved through randomized trials and the further development of the German National Transplantation Registry, which would provide a foundation for generating robust clinical insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.