Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40853366›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2025

Rescue management of recurrent or growing non-acute subdural hematoma following standalone or adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization: A case series and systematic review.

Atakan Orscelik, Yigit Can Senol, Eli Chaney, Kazim Narsinh, Matthew Amans, Daniel Ms Raper, Ethan Winkler, Steven Hetts, Daniel Cooke, Luis E Savastano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Atakan OrscelikDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6481-3076
Yigit Can SenolDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6669-6616
Eli ChaneyDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Kazim NarsinhDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2019-5461
Matthew AmansDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Daniel Ms RaperDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3378-5345
Ethan WinklerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Steven HettsDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5885-7259
Daniel CookeDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Luis E SavastanoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveRecurrent or growing non-acute subdural hematoma (SDH) following standalone or adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAe) present a complex clinical challenge. This study aims to investigate the multifactorial causes of recurrence and growing SDH, including vascular and systemic contributors, and explores management strategies to improve outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 22 patients with non-acute SDH requiring rescue treatment after adjunctive or stand-alone MMAe. Patients with documented trauma deemed responsible for the SDH expansion were excluded. Data were collected on patient demographics, clinical presentations, imaging findings, treatment approaches, and outcomes. A systematic review was also conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases, adhering to PRISMA guidelines.ResultsNon-traumatic recurrent or growing SDHs were associated with MMA recanalization (27%), contralateral supply from the contralateral MMA (27%), CSF-venous fistulas (5%), and recruitments of vascular collaterals such as deep temporal artery (5%). Management strategies included, respectively, repeat MMAe using polyvinyl alcohol particles, coils, and liquid agents; contralateral MMAe, transvenous embolization for CSF-venous fistulas; and targeted embolization for other vascular contributors. Follow-up assessments were available for 14 patients (64%). Of these, 10 patients (45%) achieved complete resolution of symptoms, three patients (14%) experienced symptomatic improvement, and one patient (5%) had worsening symptoms. In terms of hematoma resolution, nine patients (41%) had complete or near-complete resolution, three patients (14%) exhibited stable hematoma size, and two patients (9%) demonstrated a reduction in hematoma size. Notably, no recurrences were observed after the final treatment. Two patients (9%) died within 10 days of the final embolization treatment due to malignancies.ConclusionRecurrent or growing SDHs following MMAe are linked to subdural membrane vascularity and intracranial hypotension which must be investigated and addressed. Treatment of these issues results in high cure rates.

Indexed as

embolizationMiddle meningeal arteryrecurrencesubdural hematoma

Identifiers

PMID40853366
PMCPMC12378119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.