Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40853331›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2025

Microplastics: State of the Evidence on Health Effects and Public Perception.

Robin Janzik, Holger Sieg, Albert Braeuning, Gaby-Fleur Böl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2026
    Article
  2. Presentation Is Incomplete.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robin JanzikDepartment Risk Communication, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany; Department Food and Feed Safety in the Food Chain, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany; Department Chemical and Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany.
Holger Sieg
Albert Braeuning
Gaby-Fleur Böl

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicroplastics, i.e., plastic particles ranging from 1 μm to 5 mm in size, are ubiquitous in the environment. They are to be distinguished from nanoplastics, which are defined as particles less than 1 μm or less than 100 nm in size (depending on the study). Microplastics have increasingly become a topic of discussion in the media. In this article we present the state of scientific and medical knowledge about microplastics and how they are perceived by the public.

methodsThis narrative review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a search in PubMed and Scopus, supplemented by the findings of a random-quota online survey among the Germanspeaking population (N = 1135).

resultsMicroplastic particles mainly enter the body by being inhaled or swallowed. According to current knowledge, most are excreted without being resorbed, while a small fraction of them could reach the tissues or the bloodstream depending on their size and become systemically bioavailable. Approximately 0.3% of particles measuring 1-10 μm in size are resorbed in the intestinal tract. Microplastics have been found in organs and tissues (e.g., placenta, atherosclerotic plaques), but no causal relation between their uptake and any health effects has yet been proven. Given the limited available evidence on microplastics, some segments of the general population are concerned about their potential effects on human health. In our random-quota survey, 84% of respondents considered the statement that microplastics in the body can worsen pre-existing medical conditions to be true.

conclusionCurrent evidence does not permit any definitive conclusion about the effects of microplastics on health. The information presented here may help physicians counsel their patients on this matter.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureMicroplasticsPublic OpinionFemaleGermanyHumansMicroplastics

Identifiers

PMID40853331
PMCPMC12620896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.