ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2025
Microplastics: State of the Evidence on Health Effects and Public Perception.
Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2026Article
- Presentation Is Incomplete.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2026Article
- Toxicological Effects and Potential Therapeutics of Chronic Exposure to Polyurethane Nanoplastics inNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicroplastics, i.e., plastic particles ranging from 1 μm to 5 mm in size, are ubiquitous in the environment. They are to be distinguished from nanoplastics, which are defined as particles less than 1 μm or less than 100 nm in size (depending on the study). Microplastics have increasingly become a topic of discussion in the media. In this article we present the state of scientific and medical knowledge about microplastics and how they are perceived by the public.
methodsThis narrative review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a search in PubMed and Scopus, supplemented by the findings of a random-quota online survey among the Germanspeaking population (N = 1135).
resultsMicroplastic particles mainly enter the body by being inhaled or swallowed. According to current knowledge, most are excreted without being resorbed, while a small fraction of them could reach the tissues or the bloodstream depending on their size and become systemically bioavailable. Approximately 0.3% of particles measuring 1-10 μm in size are resorbed in the intestinal tract. Microplastics have been found in organs and tissues (e.g., placenta, atherosclerotic plaques), but no causal relation between their uptake and any health effects has yet been proven. Given the limited available evidence on microplastics, some segments of the general population are concerned about their potential effects on human health. In our random-quota survey, 84% of respondents considered the statement that microplastics in the body can worsen pre-existing medical conditions to be true.
conclusionCurrent evidence does not permit any definitive conclusion about the effects of microplastics on health. The information presented here may help physicians counsel their patients on this matter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.