ArticleClinical oral implants research2025
In Vitro Assessment of a Novel Piranha-Passivated Dental Implant Surface Against Oral Biofilm Formation.
Article in Clinical oral implants research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesPeri-implantitis, a significant complication resulting from bacterial colonization on dental implants, presents a challenge in oral healthcare. Developing surfaces that inhibit bacterial adhesion while promoting tissue integration is crucial for improving implant outcomes. This study aims to evaluate bacterial colonization on a novel passivated surface for dental implants using an in vitro multispecies biofilm model. MATERIALS AND
methodsThree types of titanium implants (standard, citric acid-passivated, and piranha-passivated) were characterized by analyzing roughness, contact angle values, and surface energy after the passivation treatments. The capacity for biofilm formation on these implants was evaluated using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Bacterial colonization and viability were assessed at 6, 12, and 24 h. In addition, the protein adsorption capacity of these surfaces was determined.
resultsTreatments increased hydrophilicity and polar surface energy, with no change in roughness. Although no statistically significant differences were found, a slightly lower concentration of primary and intermediate colonizers was observed on piranha-treated surfaces compared to citric acid implants, particularly during the 24-h incubation period. CLSM analyses revealed a higher percentage of dead bacteria on piranha-passivated implants over time. Piranha passivation also resulted in the lowest fibrinogen adsorption.
conclusionThese findings suggest that piranha passivation may be a promising treatment for dental implant surfaces, potentially reducing the risk of peri-implantitis. However, the inherent limitations of the in vitro approach necessitate further clinical trials to validate the efficacy of this surface modification in real-world clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.