ArticleHealth promotion international2025
Insights into organizational health literacy in Italian hospitals: findings from the M-POHL network project.
Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health-Literate Healthcare Organization Attributes and Perceived Workload Among Nurses and Nursing Coordinators.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hospitals are recognized as settings for health promotion, serving as a process that empowers individuals to gain greater control over and improve their health. Health-literate organizations play a crucial role in health promotion by creating supportive environments that ensure equitable access to health information and services, empowering individuals to engage with, understand, evaluate, and apply health information through diverse communication channels and social resources. The International Self-Assessment Tool for Organizational Health Literacy of Hospitals (OHL-Hos) was used for the first time in Italy to evaluate the implementation of OHL principles in two local hospitals and one academic hospital. The OHL-Hos is organized into 8 standards, 21 substandards, and 155 items. The degree of fulfillment with the OHL principles was calculated for substandards and standards to assess their accomplishment within the organization, along with an overall score. In each hospital, the self-assessment was carried out by an interdisciplinary team; the team members initially conducted the assessment individually, and then a joint assessment was performed to reach a consensus. The two local hospitals presented similar results and an overall level of OHL responsiveness (41.62% and 39.15%, respectively) lower than the academic hospital (63.22%). The OHL principles were found to be only partially addressed and fulfilled. The OHL-Hos tool proved valuable in identifying the most critical areas that require targeted interventions, aimed at enhancing both the OHL of the organizations and the health of individuals as a result.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.