Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40852978›Full record

SynthesisHealth promotion international2025

Health literacy research on the island of Ireland: a systematic review.

Maeve Murray, Stephen Behan, Craig Smith, Hannah Goss

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maeve MurraySchool of Health and Human Performance, Polaris Building, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin D09 V209, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-7173-0586
Stephen BehanSchool of Health and Human Performance, Polaris Building, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin D09 V209, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3085-2792
Craig SmithDepartment of Public Health and Epidemiology, Royal College of Surgeons University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin D02 DH60, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1768-6726
Hannah GossSchool of Health and Human Performance, Polaris Building, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin D09 V209, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-4264-6673

Funding

Sláintecare Healthy Communities
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consistently, low health literacy has been found to lead to poorer health outcomes, both internationally, and in Ireland. Given this knowledge, there is a need to understand key thematic trends, methodological approaches and evidence gaps in policy and practice. Seven electronic databases (Science Direct, MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science, Scopus, PsychoINFO, and SPORTDiscus) were searched between October and December 2023 focusing on studies published in English between 2013 and 2023. Initial peer reviewed records (N  = 551) were screened resulting in 37 studies included in this review. Narrative analysis indicated that across the island of Ireland many studies had narrow populations of focus (e.g. Dublin based, adults, chronic illness populations), limited research design and methodologies (e.g. cross-sectional, narrative, and primary research with short time frames), and lacked rigorous monitoring and evaluation of health literacy as a primary or secondary outcome. Future health literacy research in Ireland should consider: (i) contextual and sociodemographic factors (age, sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status) when aiming to improve health literacy in different populations, (ii) exploring health literacy beyond the clinical domain, (iii) advocating for sustainability of effective programmes, and (iv) rigorous, longitudinal evaluation of health literacy. Quality research in these areas will support the meaningful and sustainable development of health literacy in Ireland, with findings that can be transferred internationally.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyHumansIrelandhealth behaviourhealth literacysocial determinants of healthsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40852978
PMCPMC12376034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.