ArticleEuropean heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes2026
Cost-effectiveness of atrial fibrillation screening programmes across European nations.
Article in European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incident heart failure in patients with screening-detected atrial fibrillation: a post hoc analysis of the STROKESTOP and STROKESTOP II studies.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Trial
- Cost-Effectiveness of Anticoagulation Treatment for Subclinical Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Australian key stakeholder views regarding implementation of atrial fibrillation screening: a qualitative evaluation.BMJ open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsDue to the ageing population in Europe, a significant increase in the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is anticipated. This is predicted to have a detrimental impact on public health costs, particularly among the elderly, because of an increased number of stroke cases. Early detection of AF is crucial for initiating treatment with oral anticoagulants (OACs) to reduce the risk of stroke. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of implementing AF screening programmes in eight European countries: Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Serbia, Spain, and Sweden. METHODS AND
resultsThe analysis concerned invitation to AF population screening for 75-year-olds. A Markov cohort model was used, considering the prevalence of AF, screening yield, the use of different OACs, estimated clinical events, mortality, quality of life and costs. The model used country-specific parameters to produce specific cost-effectiveness estimates. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the impact of parametric uncertainties on the results. Inviting 75-year-olds to AF screening proved to be cost-effective across all eight countries analysed. In all countries, the strategy was dominant, meaning that quality-adjusted life-years were gained at lower costs. The time to financial break-even ranged from 6 to 14 years.
conclusionThis study indicates that population-based AF screening of 75-year-olds is a cost-effective strategy across eight European countries, meaning that adoption of such a strategy has the potential to make healthcare systems in these countries more efficient. The heterogeneity among European countries suggests that AF screening programmes may need to be tailored to the specific healthcare systems and conditions of each nation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.