Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40852924›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes2026

Cost-effectiveness of atrial fibrillation screening programmes across European nations.

Lars Bernfort, Johan Lyth, Kajsa Appelberg, Giuseppe Boriani, Claire M Buckley, Søren Zöga Diederichsen, Michaela Eklund, Daniel Engler, Ben Freedman, Tatjana S Potpara and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Incident heart failure in patients with screening-detected atrial fibrillation: a post hoc analysis of the STROKESTOP and STROKESTOP II studies.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lars BernfortDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Campus US, Linköping 581 83, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0537-3319
Johan LythDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Campus US, Linköping 581 83, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4988-6346
Kajsa AppelbergDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Campus US, Linköping 581 83, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0001-1593-7379
Giuseppe BorianiCardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, 411 24 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9820-4815
Claire M BuckleySchool of Public Health, University College Cork, T12K8AF Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-3174-7022
Søren Zöga DiederichsenDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9687-0857
Michaela EklundDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Campus US, Linköping 581 83, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0007-7931-8941
Daniel EnglerDepartment of General and Interventional Cardiology, The University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 202 51 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9519-6258
Ben FreedmanHeart Research Institute, Charles Perkins Centre and Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW 2042 Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3809-2911
Tatjana S PotparaSchool of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-6285-6902
Renate B SchnabelDepartment of General and Interventional Cardiology, The University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 202 51 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7170-9509
Jesper Hastrup SvendsenDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8466-8515
Lars-Åke LevinDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Campus US, Linköping 581 83, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2581-4863

Funding

Aalborg University Talent Management ProgrammeDanish Heart Foundation 11-04-R83-A3363-22625ERACoSysMed3 031L0239European Union's Horizon 101095480European Union's Horizon 648131European Union's Horizon 847770German Center for Cardiovascular Research 81Z0710114German Center for Cardiovascular Research 81Z1710103German Heart FoundationGerman Ministry of Research and Education BMBF 01ZX1408AInnovation Fund Denmark 12-1352259The Research Foundation for the Capital Region of Denmark
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsDue to the ageing population in Europe, a significant increase in the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is anticipated. This is predicted to have a detrimental impact on public health costs, particularly among the elderly, because of an increased number of stroke cases. Early detection of AF is crucial for initiating treatment with oral anticoagulants (OACs) to reduce the risk of stroke. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of implementing AF screening programmes in eight European countries: Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Serbia, Spain, and Sweden. METHODS AND

resultsThe analysis concerned invitation to AF population screening for 75-year-olds. A Markov cohort model was used, considering the prevalence of AF, screening yield, the use of different OACs, estimated clinical events, mortality, quality of life and costs. The model used country-specific parameters to produce specific cost-effectiveness estimates. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the impact of parametric uncertainties on the results. Inviting 75-year-olds to AF screening proved to be cost-effective across all eight countries analysed. In all countries, the strategy was dominant, meaning that quality-adjusted life-years were gained at lower costs. The time to financial break-even ranged from 6 to 14 years.

conclusionThis study indicates that population-based AF screening of 75-year-olds is a cost-effective strategy across eight European countries, meaning that adoption of such a strategy has the potential to make healthcare systems in these countries more efficient. The heterogeneity among European countries suggests that AF screening programmes may need to be tailored to the specific healthcare systems and conditions of each nation.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationMass ScreeningAgedAnticoagulantsCost-Benefit AnalysisEuropeFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMarkov ChainsQuality-Adjusted Life YearsStrokeAnticoagulantsAnticoagulantsAtrial fibrillationCost-effectivenessHealth careScreeningStroke

Identifiers

PMID40852924
PMCPMC12770905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.