ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2025
Comparative analysis of the extent of protein-protein interactions in icosahedral viral capsids.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- FoldaVirus, a knowledge-based icosahedral capsid prediction tool using AlphaFold.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Selection profiles in RNA viruses reflect the characteristics of viruses more than individual proteins.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of the extent of protein-protein interactions in icosahedral viral capsids.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nonenveloped viruses package, carry, and deliver their genomes to the targeted cells using protein shells known as capsids. The viral capsids come in different shapes and sizes, most exhibiting helical or icosahedral symmetries. Here, we analyzed 634 icosahedral capsids at high resolution (<4 Å) from 39 virus families with T-numbers ranging from 1 to 9 and evaluated the aggregated buried surface areas (BSAs) at the unique interfaces as a measure of capsid strength and protein-protein interactions (PPIs). The BSAs were further analyzed relative to their capsid diameters and the calculated molecular weight (MW) of coat protein subunits (CPs) occupying the icosahedral asymmetric unit (IAU). Our results show that naturally occurring viral capsids exhibit stronger PPIs relative to non-native and/or engineered capsids. Interestingly, the "T = 2" capsids cluster distinctly, exhibiting weaker PPIs relative to their capsid size and subunit MWs. Furthermore, the normalized BSAs by the MW of the CPs present in the IAU are fairly constant across different capsids, suggesting that the extent of the PPIs is proportional to the CP size with a few exceptions (e.g., "T = 2" capsids). We also identified the range of capsid diameters and MWs of CPs forming different T = number capsids, which suggest a CP of 30-50 kDa can be used to build any quasi-equivalent capsid with T-numbers 1-9. Furthermore, we identified the strongest capsids available at various diameters at 25 Å intervals. Taken together, in addition to the targeting specificities, the results from this study are useful for choosing viral capsids for biomedical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.