ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2025
AlphaFold modeling uncovers global structural features of class I and class II fungal hydrophobins.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heterologous expression and interfacial activity evaluation of Pleurotus ostreatus hydrophobin Vmh2 mutants in Tremella fuciformis.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- AlphaFold modeling uncovers global structural features of class I and class II fungal hydrophobins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hydrophobins are a family of small fungal proteins that self-assemble at hydrophobic-hydrophilic interfaces. Hydrophobins not only play crucial roles in filamentous fungal growth and development but also have attracted substantial attention due to their unique material properties. Structural characterization of class I and class II hydrophobins to date has been limited to a handful of proteins. While machine-learning-based structure prediction methods have the potential to exponentially expand our ability to define global structure-function relationships of biomolecules, they have not yet been extensively applied to hydrophobins. Here, we apply a suite of bioinformatics tools including Rosetta, AlphaFold, FoldMason, and Foldseek toward analysis, modeling, classification, and global comparison of class I and class II hydrophobins. We first probe the structural and energetic features of experimental class I and class II structures available in the Protein Data Bank. Using previously solved X-ray and NMR structures, we benchmark the ability of AlphaFold to predict class I and class II hydrophobin folds. We explore the physicochemical properties of more than 7,000 class I and class II hydrophobins in the UniProt database. Then, using AlphaFold models, we classify the structural universe of all known class I and class II hydrophobins into six distinct clades. We also uncover putative non-canonical features of hydrophobins, including extended N-terminal tails, five disulfide bonds, polyhydrophobins, and non-hydrophobin proteins containing hydrophobin-like folds. Finally, we examine the ability of AlphaFold and Chai-1 to model hydrophobin membrane binding, conformational changes, and self-assembly of class I rodlets and class II meshes. Together, our results highlight that AlphaFold not only accurately models and enables the global comparison of features within the hydrophobin protein family but also uncovers new properties that can be further evaluated with experimentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.