Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40852813›Full record

ArticleAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2026

High-Energy Aqueous Sulfur Battery Chemistry.

Xiaoyu Yu, Tengsheng Zhang, Yutong Feng, Xinran Li, Junwei Zhang, Jiachao Mi, Chao Ye, Wei Li, Dongyuan Zhao, Dongliang Chao

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiaoyu YuLaboratory of Advanced Materials, Aqueous Battery Center, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials, Shanghai Wusong Laboratory of Materials Science, College of Smart Materials and Future Energy, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, P. R. China.
Tengsheng ZhangLaboratory of Advanced Materials, Aqueous Battery Center, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials, Shanghai Wusong Laboratory of Materials Science, College of Smart Materials and Future Energy, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, P. R. China.
Yutong FengLaboratory of Advanced Materials, Aqueous Battery Center, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials, Shanghai Wusong Laboratory of Materials Science, College of Smart Materials and Future Energy, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, P. R. China.
Xinran LiLaboratory of Advanced Materials, Aqueous Battery Center, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials, Shanghai Wusong Laboratory of Materials Science, College of Smart Materials and Future Energy, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, P. R. China.
Junwei ZhangLaboratory of Advanced Materials, Aqueous Battery Center, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials, Shanghai Wusong Laboratory of Materials Science, College of Smart Materials and Future Energy, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, P. R. China.
Jiachao MiLaboratory of Advanced Materials, Aqueous Battery Center, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials, Shanghai Wusong Laboratory of Materials Science, College of Smart Materials and Future Energy, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, P. R. China.
Chao YeSchool of Chemical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Wei LiLaboratory of Advanced Materials, Aqueous Battery Center, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials, Shanghai Wusong Laboratory of Materials Science, College of Smart Materials and Future Energy, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, P. R. China.
Dongyuan ZhaoLaboratory of Advanced Materials, Aqueous Battery Center, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials, Shanghai Wusong Laboratory of Materials Science, College of Smart Materials and Future Energy, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, P. R. China.
Dongliang ChaoLaboratory of Advanced Materials, Aqueous Battery Center, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials, Shanghai Wusong Laboratory of Materials Science, College of Smart Materials and Future Energy, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7793-0044

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 20720250005National Key R&D Program of China 2022YFA1503501National Key R&D Program of China 2024YFE0101100National Natural Science Foundation of China 22088101National Natural Science Foundation of China 22279023National Natural Science Foundation of China 22309031National Natural Science Foundation of China U24A2060National Research Foundation, SingaporeScience and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 2024ZDSYS02Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 25PY2600100Science Foundation of Fudan University FudanX24A1035Shanghai International Science and Technology Partnership Project 23520750400Shanghai Pilot Program for Basic Research - Fudan University 21TQ1400100 25TQ012Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan Morning Star Project 23YF1401800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aqueous sulfur batteries (ASBs) have garnered ever-increasing interest due to their remarkable safety, high specific capacity, and cost-effectiveness. However, the present understanding of sulfur chemistry in water relies on experience derived from conventional organic electrolyte-based sulfur batteries (OSBs). The absence of a comprehensive review fundamentally distinguishing the sulfur chemistry in aqueous electrolytes from the organic counterparts leads to an insufficient understanding of ASBs, which impedes their advancement. Here, this perspective delves into the intricate aqueous-sulfur-related chemistry, offering a comprehensive analysis of the redox pathways, thermodynamic processes, and kinetic behaviors that are central to the operation of ASBs. All reactions are classified into three categories based on the solubility product constant (K

Indexed as

aqueous batteriesaqueous sulfur batteriesredox chemistrysulfur reaction

Identifiers

PMID40852813
PMCPMC13549289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.