ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025
Considering local immunity for innovative immunomodulatory approaches: pulmonary sepsis as a use case.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Longitudinal biomarker trajectories and their prognostic utility for 21-day mortality in burn patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Owing to faster identification of sepsis and improvement of patient management, most septic patients now survive the early phase of sepsis. Therefore, one of the major challenges in sepsis management today is to identify those patients at risk and propose effective personalized therapy. The complexity of the mechanisms involved in the septic immune response and its dysregulation is reflected in the diversity of immune profiles among sepsis patients. It is now well recognized that this heterogeneity is a major obstacle to stratifying patients based on their susceptibility to secondary infections. Since sepsis can originate from different anatomical sites, some studies have investigated their impact to decipher the heterogeneity. They concluded that the site of infection affects patient outcomes and leads to different immune alterations. This narrative review focuses on pulmonary sepsis to highlight the importance of studying organ response directly with local immune cells. Understanding the persistent dysregulation within the lung, whether it involves pulmonary immune cells or other lung components, is critical. Some studies have already examined the remodeling and loss of functionality of alveolar macrophages after the initial insult. Ongoing research is also investigating the impact of imbalances in other lung players, such as epithelial cells or the microbiota, on susceptibility to pulmonary reinfection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.