ReviewIntegrative medicine research2025
Comparative efficacy of moxibustion in chemotherapy-induced leukopenia: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Review in Integrative medicine research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Moxibustion has been applied in various clinical treatments, including chemotherapy-induced leukopenia. Using a Bayesian network meta-analysis, this study assessed a wide range of published data to identify the most efficient and effective method of moxibustion therapy for treating chemotherapy-induced leukopenia. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and eight other databases plus two clinical trial registration platforms were searched from their respective inception date to January 2024. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of moxibustion for chemotherapy-induced leukopenia were included. The primary outcome indicator was white blood cell count, and the secondary outcome was the Karnofsky performance status score. Stata (version 17.0) and the gemtc package (version 1.0-0) of R (version 4.3.1) were used to perform the network meta-analysis. Results: Thirty RCTs with 2282 total patients involving 12 types of moxibustion-related therapies were identified. Results of the surface under the cumulative ranking curve revealed the following treatments as most effective for leukopenia: thunder-fire moxibustion combined with medication (95.9 %), grain-sized moxibustion combined with medication (76.2 %), and herb-separated moxibustion (76.0 %). Grain-sized moxibustion combined with medication (76.5 %) ranked first in improving Karnofsky performance status scores. Conclusion: Thunder-fire moxibustion combined with medication appears to be the most effective treatment for chemotherapy-induced leukopenia. Protocol registration: This study is registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database, registration number CRD42023402588.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.