ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Continuous infusion versus intermittent dosing of ceftazidime/avibactam in critically ill patients with
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06811727 (CONTinuous Infusion Versus Intermittent Dosing of ceftaZidime/AVIbactam in Critically Ill Patients With Klebsiella Pneumoniae OXA-48 or Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infections), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
CONTinuous Infusion Versus Intermittent Dosing of ceftaZidime/AVIbactam in Critically Ill Patients With Klebsiella Pneumoniae OXA-48 or Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infections: A Single-centre Randomized Open-label Trial (ZAVICONT)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Challenges and opportunities in the management of severe pneumonia. Key concepts from the Seventh Annual Meeting of Spanish Experts 2025.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) is an essential treatment option for managing infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative (G-) bacteria, including Methods: This is a single-center, randomized, open-label trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio, conducted at the University Hospital Centre Zagreb, a tertiary care hospital in Croatia. A total of 140 critically ill ICU patients with severe infections due to Outcomes: The primary outcome will be microbiological success rate, chosen as a key indicator of pathogen eradication that is directly influenced by PK/PD target attainment. Secondary outcomes will include clinical success rate, time to symptoms improvement, length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, all-cause 28-day mortality, pathogen recurrence rate on day 28, time to weaning from mechanical ventilation, cumulative vasoactive-inotropic score, adverse events, and the ratio of ceftazidime plasma concentration to the pathogen's minimum inhibitory concentration (C/MIC). Conclusion: This trial will provide evidence on optimal CZA administration regimen in critically ill ICU patients with severe infections due to MDR G-pathogens. Clinica Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT06811727.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.