ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2025
Osteoporotic Distal Radius Fracture: Surgical Care.
Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are among the most frequent injuries in older adults, especially those with osteoporosis. In India, these fractures are becoming more common due to longer life spans, changing lifestyles, and increasing rates of undiagnosed osteoporosis. Objective: To explore the growing burden of osteoporotic DRFs and evaluate current approaches to their management, focusing on both non-surgical and surgical strategies tailored for the aging population. Methods: This review brings together recent research and clinical insights on the causes, challenges, and treatments of osteoporotic DRFs. It covers conservative care, surgical options like volar locking plates and external fixators, and newer techniques such as bone grafting, augmentation, and hemiarthroplasty. Results: This review brings together recent research and clinical insights on the causes, challenges, and treatments of osteoporotic DRFs. It covers conservative care, surgical options like volar locking plates and external fixators, and newer techniques such as bone grafting, augmentation, and hemiarthroplasty. Conclusion: Managing osteoporotic DRFs requires a personalized approach that balances bone quality, fracture type, and patient needs. Early diagnosis of osteoporosis and appropriate treatment choices can significantly improve healing, function, and overall quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.