Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40852544›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2025

Intertrochanteric Fractures: Ten Commandments for Getting Good Results with Proximal Femoral Nailing.

B Shivashankar, Sachin Sitarampant Kulkarni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

B ShivashankarIyer Orthopaedic Centre, 103, Railway Lines, Solapur, 413001 Maharashtra India.ORCID 0000-0002-1788-4936
Sachin Sitarampant KulkarniKulkarni Orthopaedic Centre, Opposite Bharati Vidya Peeth, Jule Solapur, Solapur, 413001 Maharashtra India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intertrochanteric (IT) fractures in the elderly are a major orthopaedic challenge due to osteoporotic bone quality, implant anchorage difficulties, and associated comorbidities. These factors contribute to nearly one-third mortality within a year of injury, representing a significant global health and economic burden. Methods: Historically, stable IT fractures were treated with surface implants such as dynamic hip screws (DHS), whilst intramedullary (IM) implants like proximal femoral nails (PFN) were reserved for unstable patterns. Evidence from 1999 to 2010, including Cochrane reviews, supported this practice. However, recent studies and updated Cochrane data advocate intramedullary fixation for both stable and unstable fractures. The authors draw from their extensive experience on intertrochanteric fracture management, ten important principles on fixing intertrochanteric fractures using PFN. Results: Current evidence supports the use of intramedullary implants as the preferred method for intertrochanteric fracture fixation. The authors concur with this trend and share practical tips to improve outcomes using PFN. Emphasis is placed on achieving optimal fracture reduction, which directly correlates with surgical success. Once adequate reduction is attained, a variety of intramedullary devices can effectively maintain alignment. These principles are presented as ten commandments in this article. Conclusion: Intramedullary fixation, particularly with proximal femoral or trochanteric fixation nail (TFN) utilising a dual screw system, is recommended for both stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly. Despite the availability of single screw systems favoured for their ease of use, the authors maintain preference for the two-screw design due to enhanced stability. Surgical expertise in achieving and maintaining reduction remains paramount to successful outcomes.

Indexed as

Hip fracturesInter trochanteric fracturesIntramedullary nailingPFNProximal femoral nailingTen commandmentsTips and tricks

Identifiers

PMID40852544
PMCPMC12367570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.