ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2025
A New Surgical Technique for Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Retrospective Study of 18 Cases.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The optimal treatment for acute closed Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) is still controversial. Many grassroots hospitals lack advanced equipment to perform effective minimally invasive surgeries, and open surgeries increase the incidence of complications. Therefore, we have developed a new technique specifically for grassroots hospitals. It involves using oval forceps-assisted minimally invasive suture bridge technology to treat acute closed Achilles tendon ruptures. This technique is easy to perform and has shown good clinical outcomes. Methods: We reviewed the therapeutic effectiveness of using oval forceps-assisted minimally invasive suture bridge technique in the treatment of 18 patients with ATR. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. Preoperative and postoperative follow-up data were reviewed to analyze the results and evaluate the surgical outcomes. Results: The patients were followed up for 12-16 months [( Conclusion: The use of oval forceps-assisted suture bridge technique for the treatment of acute closed ATR is characterized by its small incision, simple operation, and minimal complications, meeting the requirements for early functional rehabilitation of patients. For grassroots hospitals that receive a large number of patients, the oval forceps-assisted suture bridge technique is a surgical method worth popularizing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.