ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Toward improved stroke care in Nepal: insights from a qualitative study on barriers and success factors.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Closing the stroke care gap: a collaborative, self-sustainable telemedicine enabled model from rural Nepal.Frontiers in stroke · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Nepal Stroke Project (NSP) aims to improve stroke care in a resource-limited setting. This qualitative study explores healthcare professionals' experiences and perceptions of barriers and success factors in implementing stroke care in Nepal. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight healthcare professionals (six physicians, two nurses) involved in the NSP. Interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis, following a constructivist approach. Results: Success factors encompassed the dedication of healthcare professionals, involvement of hospital boards, effective training initiatives, and the formation of stroke teams. Positive developments noted were increased thrombolysis availability, improved stroke awareness, and growing interest in stroke care among medical professionals. Key barriers identified included lack of government ownership in stroke care advocacy, financial constraints for patients, inadequate public awareness, and challenges in implementing quality monitoring. Conclusion: While the NSP has initiated positive changes in Nepal's stroke care landscape, significant barriers persist. The study highlights the importance of addressing systemic issues such as government involvement and financial accessibility of treatments. Success factors, particularly the motivation of healthcare professionals and local ownership of the project, provide a foundation for future improvements. These findings can inform strategies for enhancing stroke care delivery in other resource-limited settings and guide ongoing initiatives within the NSP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.