Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40852508›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2025

Stepping up to the moment: collaborating on a data management and sharing workshop series.

Sara M Samuel, Yulia V Sevryugina, Mark MacEachern, Kate Saylor, Rachel Woodbrook

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Embedding FAIR Data Practices in Shared Core Resource Facilities.Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sara M Samuelhenrysm@umich.edu, Taubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6808-2514
Yulia V Sevryuginayulias@umich.edu, University Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1844-952X
Mark MacEachernmarkmac@umich.edu, Taubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8872-1181
Kate Saylorkmacdoug@umich.edu, Taubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6435-329X
Rachel Woodbrookwoodbr@umich.edu, University Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4548-944X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Many researchers benefit from training and assistance with their data management practices. The release of the Office of Science and Technology Policy's Nelson Memo and the National Institutes of Health's new Data Management and Sharing Policy created opportunities for librarians to engage with researchers regarding their data workflows. Within this environment, we-an interdisciplinary team of librarians and informationists at the University of Michigan (U-M)-recognized an opportunity to develop a series of data workshops that we then taught during the summer of 2023. Case Presentation: The series was primarily aimed at graduate students and early career researchers, with a focus on the disciplines served by the authors in the Health Sciences - Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (HS-STEM) unit of the U-M Library. We identified three topics to focus on: data management plans, organizing and managing data, and sharing data. Workshops on these topics were offered in June, July, and August 2023. Conclusion: The number of registrants and attendees exceeded our expectations with 497 registrations across the three workshops (174/169/154, respectively), and 178 attendees (79/49/50, respectively). Registrants included faculty, staff, students, and more, and were primarily from the health sciences clinical and academic units. We received a total of 45 evaluations from the three workshops which were very positive. The slides and evaluation forms from each workshop are available through U-M's institutional repository. We developed these workshops at an opportune time on campus and successfully reached many researchers.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorData ManagementInformation DisseminationLibraries, MedicalHumansMichiganUnited StatesData educationData ManagementData management and sharing plansdata servicesdata sharinglibrary workshopsWorkshops

Identifiers

PMID40852508
PMCPMC12369970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.