Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40852500›Full record

ReviewTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2025

Xenotransplantation Research -the Nonhuman Primate Model Is Preferable to the Human Decedent Model.

D K C Cooper, L Mou, J D Cleveland, J H Simmons, D C Cleveland

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Genome editing between wonder and rejection.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  4. The Top 12 Most Impactful Papers in Clinical Transplantation in 2025: TI Editors' Choice.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

D K C CooperDepartment of Surgery, Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
L MouShenzhen Xenotransplantation Medical Engineering Research and Development Center, Shenzhen Institute of Translational Medicine, Health Science Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
J D ClevelandChildren's Hospital of Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
J H SimmonsMichale E. Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine and Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX, United States.
D C ClevelandChildren's Hospital of Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Funding

Prolonging life-supported pig kidney and heart graft survival in baboons by suppressing inflammationU19AI090959 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COOPER, DAVID KC · 2010 to 2024
$26.3M
The genetically engineered pig heart as a bridge to allotransplantation in infantsR33HL163718 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CLEVELAND, DAVID C · 2022 to 2023
$990k
NHLBI NIH HHS R33 HL163718NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI090959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 40 years, the pig-to-nonhuman primate organ transplantation model has enabled progress in xenotransplantation to be made to the point that we are now carrying out initial US FDA-approved clinical experiments on "compassionate" grounds. More recently, the pig-to-human brain-dead decedent model was introduced with claims that this might replace (or at least augment) the pig-to-NHP model. There are, however, several limitations of the decedent model, most notably the very limited period during which the subject may remain sufficiently metabolically and hemodynamically stable to allow meaningful monitoring of the fate of a pig organ graft. It will be exceedingly difficult to provide the regulatory authorities with data from experiments in which truly prolonged graft function has been monitored, whereas this is already being achieved in the pig-to-NHP model. In view of the complications related to the effects of brain death, the data obtained from xenotransplantation experiments in decedents may provide confusing results. There is a real risk that this may influence the regulatory authorities to become overly cautious in approving formal clinical trials of pig organ xenotransplantation to be initiated. We conclude that experiments in human decedents will be unable to replace studies in pig-to-NHP models.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalTransplantation, HeterologousAnimalsBrain DeathHumansPrimatesSwinebrain deathdecedentkidneynonhuman primatexenotransplantation

Identifiers

PMID40852500
PMCPMC12367563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.