Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40852499›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in mammal science2024

What makes each of us unique? The nine-banded armadillo as a model to study individuality.

Delva P Leao, Alvaro Duque, Marcelo O Dietrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in mammal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Delva P LeaoLaboratory of Physiology of Behavior, Department of Comparative Medicine, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6767-9383
Alvaro DuqueMacBrain Resource Center, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5086-5438
Marcelo O DietrichLaboratory of Physiology of Behavior, Department of Comparative Medicine, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9781-2221

Funding

Yale Macaque Brain ResourceR01MH113257 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Alvaro Duque · 2017 to 2026
$4.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human brain is the foundation of our identity as a species and as individuals. It is where our unique sensations, emotions, and thoughts arise. The same way no two individuals are alike, no two brains are identical. Understanding the expression of inter-individual differences in brain and behavior and their underlying biological mechanisms can profoundly influence neuroscience and the science of individuality. Here, we argue that the nine-banded armadillo is a unique organism for the study of how inter-individual differences are expressed in the mammalian brain. Our argument is based on the fascinating reproductive biology of armadillos, the only known mammals that always generate offspring that are genetic clones, and on how this characteristic can help understand the complex interplay between genetic, environmental, and stochastic factors in the biology of individuality. We will first review the sources of variance in brain-related traits and behavior, then the biology of armadillos, and finally how they can aid in understanding the origins of variance in brain structure and function. Finally, we will provide an overview of the type of studies that can be performed using armadillos and how these studies can advance the science of individuality.

Indexed as

brain developmentcomparative & evolutionary neuroscienceDasypus novemcinctusmammalian brain developmentstochastic developmental variation

Identifiers

PMID40852499
PMCPMC12369200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.