ArticleBrain & spine2025
DNA methylation-based profiling is an effective asset for identification of tumors in suspected, yet immunohistochemically, unspecified neuro-oncological cases.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Tissue Sampling Strategy on the Diagnostic Accuracy of DNA Methylation Profiling in Central Nervous System Tumors.Pathology international · 2026Article
- Methylation profiling in neuropathological tumors diagnosis: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Patients with suspected neuro-oncological disease on radiographic images and no histopathological evidence of a tumor on the surgically retrieved tissue, pose a great challenge for clinicians and neuropathologists. Meanwhile, genome-wide DNA methylation-based molecular profiling has been established to allow robust brain tumor classification. Research question: Does DNA methylation-based molecular profiling make a relevant contribution to the diagnosis and resolution of these non-specific neuro-oncological cases. Materials and methods: We screened all neurosurgical cases at our institution between 2009 and 2021 with suspected neuro-oncological diseases on MRI but negative or unspecific histopathological diagnosis. We differentiated two groups: cases with cell-enriched, reactive tissue (with or without suspected single tumor cells), insufficient to classify the lesion according to WHO 2021 diagnostic criteria for CNS tumors (group 1) and cases that were not cell-enriched, without reactive changes and no suspected tumor cells (group 2). The primary endpoint of the study was to assess the feasibility of establishing a molecular diagnosis in accordance with the WHO 2021 diagnostic criteria for CNS tumors. Results: 23 cases with unspecified histopathological diagnosis were identified, 16 cases were assigned to group 1, seven cases to group 2. DNA-methylation-based profiling and copy number variations enabled a tumor diagnosis in nine (56.3 %) cases in group 1 and three (42.9 %) cases in group 2, adding up to 12 tumors (52.2 %). Five cases were identified as physiological cortex. Discussion and conclusion: Our findings underscore the potential of integrating DNA methylation-based profiling into diagnostic workflows, contributing to an accurate diagnosis in challenging cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.