ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Intradural paragangliomas in the cauda equina region: a case report and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinicoradiological Features and Surgical Outcomes of Cauda Equina Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cauda Equina Paragangliomas (CEPs) are rare neuroendocrine tumors with an atypical clinical profile. They pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to their varied manifestations and low incidence. This case report aims to contribute to the limited literature on CEPs by detailing the presentation, diagnosis, and surgical management of a new case. Case report: A 51-year-old female presented with a 20-day history of worsening lumbago and urinary dysfunction. MRI scans revealed a 2cm mass at the L1 vertebral level, leading to the diagnosis of an intraspinal CEP. The patient underwent a successful surgical resection with intraoperative monitoring to manage hemodynamic changes. Postoperative care included hypertension management, and the patient was discharged after a three-week recovery period with a plan for long-term follow-up. Conclusion: The successful surgical resection of this CEP highlights the importance of precise preoperative imaging and a multidisciplinary approach to management. Despite the rarity of CEPs, this case underscores the feasibility of complete tumor removal and the necessity for long-term monitoring. The evolving landscape of diagnostic and therapeutic tools holds promise for improving outcomes in these rare tumors. Continued research and collaboration are vital for enhancing our understanding and treatment of CEPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.