ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Integration of CT and MRI imaging with plastination for enhanced veterinary anatomy education: a study on the crab-eating fox (
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: With the advancements in diagnostic imaging and its increasing use in veterinary medicine, it is essential for professionals to continuously update their knowledge and seek training in the anatomy of various wild animal species. Plastination allows for the preservation of biological tissues and their anatomical details, enhancing the study and identification of structures. Methods: This study aimed (1) to describe in detail the anatomy of the thoracic and pelvic limbs of the crab-eating fox ( Results: The study enabled detailed identification and description of anatomical structures in plastinated transverse sections and their correlation with corresponding axial CT and MRI images, as well as the 3D reconstruction of the limbs for anatomical correspondence with each sectioned region. Qualitatively, the specimens showed excellent preservation of anatomical features, allowing for clear visualization and identification of structures while maintaining their syntopic relationships. The plastinated material was rigid, easy to handle, odorless, and free from toxic characteristics. Quantitative analysis demonstrated minimal shrinkage in the plastinated tissues. Discussion: Plastinated metameric sections of the thoracic and pelvic limbs of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.