ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems2025
The Hidden Threat of Hallucinations in Binary Chest X-ray Pneumonia Classification.
Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hallucination in deep learning (DL) classification, where DL models yield confidently erroneous predictions remains a pressing concern. This study investigates whether binary classifiers are truly learning disease-specific features when distinguishing overlapping radiological presentations among pneumonia subtypes on chest X-ray (CXR) images. Specifically, we evaluate if uncertainty measure is a valuable tool in classifying signs of different pathogen-specific subtypes of pneumonia. We evaluated two binary classifiers to classify bacterial pneumonia and viral pneumonia, respectively, from normal CXRs. A third classifier explored the ability to distinguish bacterial from viral pneumonia presentation to highlight our concern regarding the observed hallucinations in the former cases. Our comprehensive analysis computes the Matthews Correlation Coefficient and prediction entropy metrics on a pediatric CXR dataset and reveals that the normal/bacterial and normal/viral classifiers consistently and confidently misclassify the unseen pneumonia subtype to their respective disease class. These findings expose a critical limitation concerning the tendency of binary classifiers to hallucinate by relying on general pneumonia indicators rather than pathogen-specific patterns, thereby challenging their utility in clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.