ArticlePain reports2025
Real-time and recollected ratings of pain, mood, and fatigue in older adults.
Article in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pain intensity variability refers to the fluctuations in pain intensity levels experienced by an individual over time. Technological advances have simplified the use of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) paradigms for researchers and participants allowing for easier measurement of pain intensity variability by measuring pain intensity multiple times a day over several days. In this study, we used EMA to investigate the relationship between variability in pain intensity, mood, and fatigue and accuracy of recall in older adults. Methods: Twenty-six cognitively normal participants aged 60 and above completed EMA 3 times daily over 14 days, rating their pain intensity, mood, and fatigue using a smartphone application. On the 15th day, participants were asked to recall their average levels of these variables. Results: We found that greater variability in pain intensity was significantly associated with poorer recall accuracy, even when controlling for peak pain, end pain, and the number of painful areas. However, no significant associations were found between variability and recall accuracy for mood or fatigue. Conclusion: These results suggest that the difficulties with recall accuracy are specific to pain intensity and do not extend to mood or fatigue, highlighting the importance of considering pain intensity variability in understanding and managing pain in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.