ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Postpartum depression risk prediction using explainable machine learning algorithms.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A proposed anxiety-hypertonic pelvic floor axis in postpartum women: a narrative review of mechanistic links and rehabilitation implications.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Putting equity first: reorienting artificial intelligence for population-level postpartum depression prevention.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- A novel interpretable machine learning framework for predicting postpartum depression: a SHAP-based analysis of maternal and infant health indicators.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Hyperuricemia in hospitalized patients with heart failure: prevalence and clinical correlates.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of an explainable XGBoost model with a web-based calculator for risk prediction of postpartum depressive symptoms.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Postpartum depression (PPD) is a common and serious mental health complication after childbirth, with potential negative consequences for both the mother and her infant. This study aimed to develop an explainable machine learning model to predict the risk of PPD and to identify its key predictive factors. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1,065 women who attended their 6-week postpartum follow-up visit at a tertiary maternal and child healthcare hospital in Shenyang, China, from January to December 2021. Feature selection was performed using LASSO regression and the Boruta algorithm. Eight machine learning algorithms were then employed to construct the prediction models. Model performance was evaluated according to the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, recall, F1 score, and accuracy. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) were used to visualize the features of the model and individual case predictions. Results: Among the 1,065 women, 251 (23.5%) developed PPD. An 11-variable prediction model was developed, with XGBoost showing the best performance on both training and validation sets. After optimizing the model parameters and applying 10-fold cross-validation, the model achieved an average accuracy of 0.95, an average AUC of 0.955, average precision of 0.945, and average specificity of 0.985, indicating excellent predictive performance. The key predictive factors included weight gain during pregnancy, relationship with the mother-in-law, sleep quality, marital relationship, planned pregnancy, fetal sex preference, pregnancy-related anxiety, pelvic-floor muscle endurance, cervix status, attendance at prenatal education classes, and postpartum care satisfaction. Conclusion: The XGBoost model demonstrated optimal performance at predicting PPD and can aid healthcare professionals to identify high-risk individuals. The SHAP method enhanced the model's interpretability, facilitating a better understanding of the causes of PPD, how to prevent it, and how to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.