ArticleHealth science reports2025
Hybrid Radiomics and Machine Learning for Brain Tumors Multi-Task Classification: An Exploratory Study on Integrating GLCM and Curvelet-Based Features for Enhanced Accuracy.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Accurate classification of brain tumors is vital for effective treatment planning. Manual assessment of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans is often subjective and time-consuming. This exploratory study proposes a machine learning approach integrating radiomic features from contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI scans to improve classification accuracy for glioblastomas (GBM), meningiomas, brain metastases, and normal controls (NC). Methods: A total of 154 patients (74 GBM, 62 meningioma, 18 brain metastases) and 170 NCs were included in the study. MRI scans underwent standard preprocessing. To address class imbalance, data augmentation was applied to the GBM, meningioma, and brain metastases groups, increasing their sample sizes to 148, 124, and 180 cases, respectively. Radiomic features were extracted using gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) analysis and Curvelet-based transformations. Feature selection was performed using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), followed by multicollinearity assessment using the Spearman correlation test. Principal component analysis (PCA) was also performed. Nine machine learning classifiers, including Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Categorical Boosting (CatBoost), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), Naive Bayes, AdaBoost, and LightGBM, were trained and evaluated. Results: Random Forest and CatBoost achieved the highest performance, with 95.2% accuracy using LASSO-selected features, outperforming other classifiers. Combining GLCM and Curvelet features improved accuracy over either set alone. PCA-based dimensionality reduction (99% variance) also performed well, but slightly below LASSO. Conclusion: Integrating Curvelet and GLCM-based radiomics with optimized models improves diagnostic accuracy, offering a promising tool to assist radiologists in tumor classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.