Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40852117›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of data science and analytics2025

Narratives from GPT-derived networks of news and a link to financial markets dislocations.

Deborah Miori, Constantin Petrov

Abstract readNews
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of data science and analytics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Deborah MioriMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Constantin PetrovFidelity Investments, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce a novel framework to study the dynamics of news narratives, by leveraging GPT3.5 advanced text analysis capabilities and graph theory. In particular, we focus on a corpus of economic articles from The Wall Street Journal and dynamically extract the main topics of discussion over time, in a completely systematic and scalable fashion. As a simple application of the suggested approach, we show how the structure of such topics of discussion has a statistically significant relationship with the contemporaneous state of financial markets, which can be used to construct an investment strategy or monitor financial risks. Our work is based on the intrinsic ability of GPT models to track the context of sentences within a document, thanks to which we can accurately extract a ranking of the most important entities discussed within each article, and evaluate their entity-specific sentiments. Then, we create a graph for each week of data, in which nodes are the entities retrieved and edges are built from the co-occurrence of such entities within articles. Graph centrality measures are computed over time to track the most representative keywords of topics of discussion, which result in an accurate summary view of the evolution of economic narratives. Fuzzy community detection is finally used to cluster linked entities into a more detailed representation of topics. Such groups of entities are mapped to the related journal articles, which are in turn summarised to reach a highly nuanced and interpretable view of the topics discussed within each week. Linking the features of these topics to the relevant financial market time series, we find that high fragmentation within our networks' communities relates to moments of financial markets dislocations (i.e. dates with unusually high volatility across asset classes). This result should thus motivate stronger effort within financial research to move beyond ubiquitous sentiment analysis of news and delve deeper into broader and more holistic studies of textual data.

Indexed as

Large Language ModelsMarket dislocationsNetwork analysis

Identifiers

PMID40852117
PMCPMC12367935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.