ArticleMalaysian orthopaedic journal2025
Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Ilizarov Bone Transport in Traumatic Tibial Bone Loss.
Article in Malaysian orthopaedic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Comment on: Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Ilizarov Bone Transport in Traumatic Tibial Bone Loss.Malaysian orthopaedic journal · 2025Article
- Finite Element Analysis of Von Mises Stress in External Fixators for Open Tibial Fractures: A Comparative Study of ASTM F1541-02 and Tibia-Based Models in Indonesian Patients.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
- Failure Modes in Ilizarov Limb Salvage: A Narrative Review of Technical, Biological, Patient-related and Systemic Determinants.Strategies in trauma and limb reconstructionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bone loss is a serious complication following an open fracture or fracture-related infection in the tibia. Treatment with Ilizarov bone transport in this condition is preferred because it minimises additional soft tissue injury and is able to close the bone and soft tissue defects through distraction osteogenesis. The objective of this study is to evaluate the relationship between functional outcomes of patients with tibial bone loss treated with Ilizarov bone transport and return to work. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study among 40 patients was carried out in 2 public hospitals. Patient records and radiographs were reviewed for information on the initial injuries, treatment, union of bone, and complications while on treatment. The clinical outcomes were evaluated with ASAMI Bone grading system while the functional outcome of the affected limb was assessed using Lower Extremity Score (LEFS) and ASAMI Functional grading system at least 10 months after the removal of the Ilizarov external fixator. Results: Thirty-eight (95%) achieved union. Thirty-six (90.0%) patients had excellent and good scores for clinical and functional results, respectively using the ASAMI grading system. The mean LEFS is 80.1% (range 58 to 91%). Thirty-three (82.5%) patients were able to return to work. The clinical outcome has a strong and positive correlation with functional outcome both on ASAMI functional score and LEFS (p<0.001). Patients with good and excellent ASAMI functional scores significantly correlate with higher odds to return to work (p<0.001). Return to work was also associated with a higher LEFS score (p=0.006). Conclusion: Most patients with tibial non-union treated with Ilizarov bone transport have good and excellent clinical and functional outcomes and are able to return to work. Return to work significantly correlates with good functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.