ArticleMalaysian orthopaedic journal2025
Impact of Graft Tunnel Placement on Short-Term Clinical Outcome Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Article in Malaysian orthopaedic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are a common musculoskeletal injury often requiring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Many factors are thought to influence patient outcome and determining the extent can allow for optimisation of patient care. One of these factors is graft tunnel placement, both femoral and tibial. The aim of this study was to investigate whether graft tunnel placement influences clinical outcome following ACLR. Materials and Methods: The patient responses from six patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) at initial presentation and one year following ACLR, as well as demographic data at presentation, were collected. Graft tunnel placement was evaluated using 10 validated radiological measurements on antero-posterior and lateral radiographs following surgery. Results: A total of 45 patients were included in the study. There was a significant longitudinal improvement (p<0.001) for almost all PROM scores when comparing pre-operative to post-operative results. Overall, no significant correlation was demonstrated between graft tunnel placement and PROM scores, except for a weak association between femoral tunnel positioning on lateral view radiographs and the overall Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (rho=0.37, p=0.038) and the Lysholm score (rho=0.36, p=0.034) and also tibial tunnel placement on lateral view radiographs and the EQ-5D VAS score (rho=0.37, p=0.037). Conclusion: ACLR is a clinically successful treatment strategy for patients with symptomatic ACL tears. Graft tunnel positioning does not generally affect clinical outcomes, although there may be a weak association with femoral tunnel positioning on lateral radiographs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.