ArticleMalaysian orthopaedic journal2025
Does the Reliability and Accuracy of the Judet and Letournel Classification System for Acetabular Fractures Increase using a Novel Algorithm?
Article in Malaysian orthopaedic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: We have devised an algorithm to assist classifying acetabulum fractures using plain radiographs. This study aimed to test if the accuracy and reliability of fracture classification increases using our algorithm in resident doctors. Materials and Methods: Seventy-two residents of eight tertiary care institutes took part in our survey. These residents were divided into three groups, Groups A, B, and C, with 31, 20, and 21 residents, respectively. Two different Collections (1 and 2) containing radiographs of twenty patients each, with known classification from CT and intra-operative findings, were prepared. Collection 1 radiographs were given to Group A and B, and Collection 2 radiographs were given to Group C. Group A residents were asked to classify the fractures using our algorithm, and Group B and C residents were asked to classify the fractures according to their understanding. Intra-observer and interobserver reliability were estimated. Results: A total of 1411 unique responses were made. The accuracy of group A, B, and C residents was 53.8%, 34.9% and 28.3%, respectively (p-value 0.001). The interobserver reliability for fracture classification was fair with an algorithm (κ = 0.32) and slight without an algorithm. The intra-observer reliability among five observers was moderate (κ = 0.43). Conclusion: Our algorithm improves the accuracy and reliability for classifying acetabular fractures according to the Judet-Letournel classification for resident doctors with two to four years of experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.