ArticleMalaysian orthopaedic journal2025
Biomechanical Evaluation of Flexor Tendon Repair: Double Loop Technique with Epitendinous Suture.
Article in Malaysian orthopaedic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: There are various methods used to repair lacerated tendons. The minimum requirement for the best results and lowest rupture rate is the four-strand repair technique. The cruciate type of repair is among the most popular methods available but is very technical and requires expertise. An easier two-double-loop method for tendon healing is suggested in this study. This study assessed the biomechanical properties of two well-known tendon repair techniques-the modified Kessler and cruciate approaches-and two lesser-known double-loop techniques for tensile strength, stiffness, and failure mode. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four adult chickens' Achilles tendons were randomly divided into three groups and sutured with a four-strand core suture using the four-strand modified Kessler technique, the four-strand cruciate technique, and the two-double-loop approach. Twenty-four more adult chicken Achilles tendons were acquired, and they were randomly assigned to the same three groups along with an extra running epitendinous repair. A synthetic, non-absorbable monofilament polypropylene suture was used for all repairs. Results: The four-strand modified Kessler, and the four-strand cruciate procedures had the lowest mean ultimate tensile strength, whereas the two double-loop techniques had the strongest. The results were dramatically impacted by using an epitendinous suture during test analysis. Conclusion: The strongest and comparatively less technically complex technique used in this investigation was the two-double-loop, four-strand core suture method. The significance of the extra strength that the epitendinous suture gave was clear. Using this in a clinical setting is recommended for hand flexor tendon injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.