ReviewAsian journal of neurosurgery2025
Spinal Robotics in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Key Concepts and Technical Considerations.
Review in Asian journal of neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global research trends and hotspots in robot-assisted spinal surgery for spinal deformity: a bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic assistance in spine surgery has long been pursued to innovate minimally invasive procedures and enhance patient safety, outcomes, operation time, and affordability. Over the past few decades, advancements in navigation and robotics have fundamentally transformed the role of technology in spine surgery, with their applications continuously expanding. In particular, this technology has made significant strides in the setting of adult spinal deformity (ASD), driving innovations for this technically challenging pathology. In this review, the authors explore key aspects of robotic assistance in ASD surgery, including software planning and construct design, pedicle screw placement, sacropelvic fixation, operative outcomes, and the learning curve associated with adopting this technology. Research articles for this qualitative review were indexed using PubMed and Google Scholar. The review also addresses the opportunities and challenges ahead in the field. Although this technology is in its relative infancy, the growing body of research is beginning to fully characterize its utility in surgery and its potential to redefine the standard of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.