ArticleAsian journal of neurosurgery2025
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Madras Head Injury Prognostication Scale (MHIPS) in Predicting Mortality among Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.
Article in Asian journal of neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate prediction of outcomes in traumatic brain injury (TBI) is crucial for optimizing therapeutic interventions and improving patient survival rates. Objectives: This article determines the diagnostic accuracy of Madras Head Injury Prognostication Scale (MHIPS) in predicting mortality among patients with TBI, and compares the performance of MHIPS scores with that of Corticosteroid Randomisation after Significant Head Injury (CRASH) and International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) scores. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted among patients ( Results: Of the 100 patients, 92 patients (92.0%) were survivors of which 4 patients (4.0%) had disability and 8 patients died/nonsurvivors (8.0%). Age more than 40 years, higher heart rate, lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores, lower MHIPS scores, higher CRASH scores, and higher IMPACT scores were significantly ( Conclusion: MHIPS, CRASH, and IMPACT are effective tools for prognosticating mortality in TBI patients. MHIPS score offers simplicity and ease of use, making it valuable in resource-limited environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.