Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40852071›Full record

ArticleAsian journal of neurosurgery2025

Microscopic Minimal Invasive Resection of Spinal Tumor with Tubular Retractor System: Case Studies of 70 Patients with Literature Review.

Mohan Karki, Rakesh Pandey, Manish Vaish, Girish Rajpal, Yaspal Singh Bundela, Hrishikesh Chakrabartty, Dipanshu Narula

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian journal of neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohan KarkiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Vaishali, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Rakesh PandeyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Vaishali, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Manish VaishDepartment of Neurosurgery, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Vaishali, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Girish RajpalDepartment of Neurosurgery, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Vaishali, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Yaspal Singh BundelaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Vaishali, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Hrishikesh ChakrabarttyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Vaishali, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Dipanshu NarulaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Vaishali, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Minimal invasive spine surgery with tubular retractor system avoids contralateral laminectomy, minimizes manipulation of midline supportive structures, and reduces surgical morbidity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of microscopic minimal invasive tubular retractor system for intradural spinal tumor resection. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was performed in 70 patients who were admitted between January 2017 and January 2024 with intradural spinal tumors and underwent excision with microscopic minimal invasive tubular retractor system. Patient's data including age, sex, clinical symptoms, and magnetic resonance imaging were collected. The extent of resection, surgical complications, estimated blood loss, estimated surgical time, and neurological outcomes were recorded. The neurological assessment was done by the modified McCormick grading scale pre- and postoperatively. Results: Out of 70 patients, there were 38 (54.28%) males and 32 (45.71%) females, with a mean age of 45.16 (range: 8-79) years. The histology of these cases was meningioma (34.28%), schwannoma (51.42%), astrocytoma (2.85%), ependymoma (2.85%), and neurofibroma (8.57%). The average volume of tumors was 1.98 cm Conclusion: Microscopic minimal invasive resection of intradural spinal tumor by the tubular retractor system is safe and effective with excellent neurological improvement as well as better resection rate, short hospital stay, and less surgical complication.

Indexed as

excisionintradural spinal tumorminimal invasiveoutcometubular retractor

Identifiers

PMID40852071
PMCPMC12370329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.