Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40852068›Full record

ArticleAsian journal of neurosurgery2025

Comparative Analysis of Bite Force after Cranioplasty with and without Temporalis Dissection in Large Skull Defects Caused by Decompressive Craniectomy.

Soumya Deepta Nandi, Raja K Kutty, Jyothish Laila Sivanandapanicker, Sunilkumar Balakrishnan Sreemathyamma, Raj S Chandran, Rosebist Pathrose Kamalabai, Libu Gnanaseelan Kanakamma, Rajmohan Bhanu Prabhakar, Sureshkumar Kunjuni Leela, Anilkumar Peethambaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian journal of neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Soumya Deepta NandiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Government Medical College Trivandrum, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Raja K KuttyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Government Medical College Trivandrum, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8077-9453
Jyothish Laila SivanandapanickerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Government Medical College Trivandrum, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Sunilkumar Balakrishnan SreemathyammaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Government Medical College Trivandrum, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0821-3601
Raj S ChandranDepartment of Neurosurgery, Government Medical College Trivandrum, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Rosebist Pathrose KamalabaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Government Medical College Trivandrum, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Libu Gnanaseelan KanakammaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Government Medical College, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Rajmohan Bhanu PrabhakarDepartment of Neurosurgery, Government Medical College Trivandrum, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Sureshkumar Kunjuni LeelaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Government Medical College Trivandrum, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Anilkumar PeethambaranDepartment of Neurosurgery, Government Medical College Trivandrum, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cranioplasty involves repairing the skull defect using an autologous bone flap or synthetic molds. The temporalis muscle, detached during decompressive craniectomy (DC), may be reattached to the bone flap for better cosmetic reconstruction. Along with the masseter and pterygoid muscles, the temporalis muscle significantly contributes to the human bite force. In this study, we analyze patients' bite force in which the temporalis muscle was either dissected and reattached or left undisturbed during cranioplasty. Materials and Methods: All patients who previously underwent DC for traumatic brain injury or stroke were grouped into two, depending on the method of cranioplasty. In group 1, patients underwent temporalis muscle dissection and reattachment to the bone flap or prosthesis. In group 2, the temporalis muscle was left undisturbed. The bite force of the subjects was measured bilaterally in both groups by a gnathodynamometer before cranioplasty and 3 months after the surgery. We compared the difference in bite force of the subjects individually on both sides, preoperatively and postoperatively, as well as between the groups. Results: This study included 36 patients over 18 years of age, with 18 patients in each group. Preoperatively, the bite force of all the subjects was decreased on the side of the DC compared with the normal side. After cranioplasty, the bite force significantly improved compared with preoperative values in both groups. Conclusion: Temporalis dissection can be safely done during cranioplasty. There is improvement in bite force after cranioplasty with or without temporalis dissection.

Indexed as

bite forcecranioplastydecompressive craniectomytemporalis dissection

Identifiers

PMID40852068
PMCPMC12370351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.