Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40852063›Full record

ArticleAsian journal of neurosurgery2025

Management Protocols for Sepsis and Septic Shock after Craniotomy: Clinical Outcomes and Survival Analysis.

Panu Boontoterm, Siraruj Sakoolnamarka, Karanarak Urasyanandana, Pusit Fuengfoo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian journal of neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Panu BoontotermNeurological Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3989-1301
Siraruj SakoolnamarkaNeurological Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Karanarak UrasyanandanaNeurological Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pusit FuengfooDepartment of Surgery, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Central nervous system infections are linked to a substantial rise in perioperative mortality, with postoperative neurosurgical infections being both prevalent and severe. Although the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines offer a framework for managing sepsis, their effect on clinical outcomes in neurosurgical patients has yet to be fully explored. The aim of this study was to compare mortality rates and clinical outcomes in neurosurgical patients with sepsis and septic shock treated according to the SSC protocol versus standard care. Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective analysis on prospectively acquired data included 159 patients with neurosurgical sepsis and septic shock, divided into two groups: 77 patients managed according to the SSC guidelines and 82 patients receiving standard treatment. Data on baseline characteristics, initial management within the first hour, and 30-day clinical outcomes were collected and analyzed. Results: The mortality rate was significantly lower in the SSC protocol group. Additionally, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay was significantly shorter, and the number of ventilator- and vasopressor-free days was significantly higher in the SSC protocol group ( Conclusion: Implementing the SSC protocol within the first hour of treatment significantly reduced mortality, shortened ICU length of stay, and increased the number of ventilator- and vasopressor-free days.

Indexed as

central nervous system infectionsmortality rateperioperative mortalityprotocolsepsisSurviving Sepsis Campaign

Identifiers

PMID40852063
PMCPMC12370350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.